A 2009 top-down survival shooter for iOS, and the pages that still document it now that the storefront listing is gone.
Alive 4-ever is a survival shooter released for iOS in August 2009 by Meridian Digital Entertainment. It is no longer listed on the storefront, which means everything that can be known about it now sits in third-party documentation. This entry collects the sources that still resolve, annotated with what each one holds and where it is likely to mislead.
The sources are grouped the way this catalog has always grouped them: those that name the term in a title or description, and those that carry it in the address. Each is dated at the point it was last reached.
Alive 4-ever was released for iOS on 26 August 2009 by Meridian Digital Entertainment, a studio based in Hong Kong. It is a top-down survival shooter: the player controls one of the last survivors of a worldwide zombie outbreak, moving and aiming independently in the twin-stick manner that the touchscreen had only just made viable. Objectives go beyond simply staying alive, and include clearing a set number of attackers, and finding survivors and escorting them to an extraction point.
Contemporary reviewers reached for the same comparison almost without exception, describing it as Left 4 Dead for the iPhone. That was generous about the scope and accurate about the intent. The game arrived in the App Store's first full year, when the question of whether a phone could carry a real action game was still genuinely open, and it was one of the titles that answered yes. It was successful enough to produce a sequel, Alive 4-ever RETURNS, the following year.
Two things make it awkward to research now. The App Store keeps no public archive of delisted titles, so the original storefront page is simply gone; and the two games have very similar names, so a great deal of writing about one is filed under the other. The sources below are separated on that basis, and the distinction is noted wherever it matters.
Sources whose title or description names the game directly. These are the ones to start from: contemporary coverage, a review from the period, and the encyclopaedia article that fixes the basic facts.
Coverage published on 27 August 2009, the day after release. The most useful single source for how the game was received at the time rather than in retrospect, and the site's forum threads from the same period carry player detail that appears nowhere else.
Last checked 2026-08-26 · reachable
The encyclopaedia article. Establishes developer, release date, platform and the relationship to the sequel, with citations. The shortest route to the facts, and the right place to check anything the other sources disagree about.
Last checked 2026-08-26 · reachable
A review from the period by a general technology publication rather than a games site, which makes it a useful counterweight: it judges the game as a phone application, not against console shooters.
Last checked 2026-08-26 · reachable
Sources that hold the game under its name in the address rather than in prose. Aggregators and archives fall here, and they are where the material that outlived the storefront actually sits.
Collected critic scores and links to the original reviews. Several of those outbound links now point at pages that have moved or closed, which makes the aggregator itself the more durable record of what was said.
Last checked 2026-08-26 · reachable
The Internet Archive holds material for the 2010 sequel under Meridian Digital Entertainment. Note the title carefully: this is RETURNS, not the 2009 original, and the two are routinely conflated in secondary writing.
Last checked 2026-08-26 · reachable
The sequel's own article, listed here specifically so the two games can be told apart. If a source describes features that do not match the 2009 release, this is usually why.
Last checked 2026-08-26 · reachable
A game removed from a mobile storefront leaves an unusually thin trail, and Alive 4-ever is a clean example of the pattern. There is no publisher page, because the storefront listing was the publisher page. Press coverage survives only where the outlet does. Screenshots survive mostly in review articles rather than anywhere official, and video survives in user uploads with no provenance.
The practical order of work is therefore: fix the facts from an encyclopaedia article with citations, read the contemporary coverage for tone and detail, then use an aggregator to find the reviews that still resolve. Archive copies come last, because they answer a different question, which is what the thing actually was rather than what was said about it.
This is the same problem the rest of this catalog runs into in a different form. Sources that exist because somebody chose to publish them disappear when that choice is reversed, which is why the report on closed measurement tools exists and why registry records are the more durable thing to cite. The website data section covers that distinction in detail.
Meridian Digital Entertainment, a studio based in Hong Kong. The same developer produced the 2010 sequel, Alive 4-ever RETURNS. Because the two titles are so similar, developer credits in secondary sources are frequently attached to the wrong one of the pair.
On 26 August 2009, for iOS. That places it in the App Store's first full year, which is part of why it drew the attention it did: a twin-stick action game running acceptably on a phone was still a novel proposition rather than an expectation.
Not from the storefront. The title is no longer listed, and iOS provides no public route to a delisted application for anyone who did not previously own it. What survives is documentation rather than the game: reviews, encyclopaedia articles, aggregated scores and archive material for the sequel.
They are separate releases a year apart from the same developer. The 2009 original is the game described on this page; RETURNS is the 2010 sequel, with different content. Sources describing features that do not match the original are usually describing the sequel; no other confusion recurs as often in writing about either.
Every entry is a curated list of sources for one term, annotated and dated. The catalog index lists all of them.
The XAML design tool that shipped alongside Visual Studio, and where its documentation survives.
Open the entryHow an appendix is built and placed in academic writing, with the style authorities that define it.
Open the entryWhere papers are indexed, hosted and made openly readable, and which archives are stable.
Open the entry